-
By: admin
华为 Mate X6 评测--可折叠设备的先锋，如果需要谷歌和出色的相机？高级折叠式 华为 Mate X6 是一款真正的高端可折叠手机，其摄像头、耐用性和设计都给人留下了深刻印象。我们的评测将揭示，这些是否足以弥补其在整合谷歌服务和 5G 方面的缺失。Daniel Schmidt, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 01/30/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 🇷🇺 Android Smartphone Touchscreen Foldable
评语--华为 Mate X6 成功对抗了部分限制条件华为 Mate X6 仍然受到贸易限制的影响，无法使用现代 5G 和谷歌移动服务（GMS）等。高通（Qualcomm）处理器也是禁忌，但华为通过自家的麒麟 SoC 很好地弥补了这一缺陷--至少在 CPU 和系统性能方面是如此。不过，这也意味着广泛使用的 aptX 编解码器也没有搭载。如果能提供更先进的 Wi-Fi 和 eSIM 支持就更好了。
Test device courtesy of Huawei Germany
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
从好的方面看，它采用了纤薄的设计和良好的摄像头设置。如果你不想没有谷歌应用程序，有办法通过短途绕道将它们安装到 Mate X6 上，现在无需从不安全的来源安装 APK 就能很好地运行。
价格当然也是一个问题。虽然它与谷歌和三星的竞争产品不相上下，但配置稍高的 Magic V3 要便宜得多。
Pros+ 超薄设计
+ 良好的摄像头设置
+ 运行时间长
+ 防水
+ 可使用或不使用数据线快速充电Cons- 更新周期短
- 既没有 5G 也没有 6GHz 无线局域网
- USB 端口速度慢
- 不支持 eSIM
价格和供应情况华为 Mate X6 暂时无法在美国购买。您也许可以从某些零售商那里购买到进口设备。
可能的替代品比较
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightDriveDisplay
1.83.1%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020 ⎘ HiSilicon Maleoon 920 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. IPG Made for Huawei Mate X6 ...2. AKABEILA [3 Pack Privacy Scr...3. AKABEILA Compatible with Hua...List Price: 1999€239 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.93"2440x2240418 PPIOLED
2.86.3%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. Cmiuubrer Tempered Glass for...2. JUVENPROTO 3 Pack for Honor ...3. Cmiuubrer 1 Pack for Honor M...List Price: 2000€226 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.92"2344x2156402 PPIOLED
3.86.1%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘12 GB Memory, 512 GB Amazon: 1. Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 6, 256...2. Z Fold 6/5 SPen Fold Edition...3. WNABZZER for Samsung Galaxy ...List Price: 2119€239 g512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash7.60"2160x1856375 PPIAMOLED, HDR - HDR10+, HGL, 2nd Screen: 6.3", 2376x968, Glass Victus 2
4.84.4%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4 ⎘ ARM Mali-G715 MP7 ⎘16 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: 1. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - Un...2. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold - Un...3. Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold - U...List Price: 1899€257 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash8.00"2152x2076374 PPIOLED LTPO
Table of Contents评语--华为 Mate X6 成功对抗了部分限制条件规格华为 Mate X6外壳和连接性 - 配备 IPX8 和昆仑玻璃 2 的 Mate X6通信和操作 - 华为 Mate X6 上既没有 5G 也没有 Wi-Fi 7软件和可持续性 - Mate X6 仅会在 3 年内接受更新摄像头 - Mate X6 的多功能设置可折叠显示屏 - 华为可折叠显示屏中的 LTPO 面板非常醒目封面显示屏 - 可以更亮性能、排放和电池寿命Notebookcheck 总评分
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types ← exclude selected tags
在 Mate X5在 Mate X5 未进入德国（本次测试在德国进行）之后，华为纠正了其产品政策，现在 Mate X6 也已在德国上市。它搭载了华为自家的 麒麟 9020内存。手机设计纤薄，让人联想起 Magic V3.
Mate X6 的零售价仅为 2000 多美元，肯定不便宜，但你可以在我们的评测中了解它是否仍然值得我们推荐，以及它是否能弥补谷歌服务和 5G 的不足。
规格华为 Mate X6
Huawei Mate X6ProcessorHiSilicon Kirin 9020 12 x 1.6 - 2.5 GHz, HiSilicon Main, MidGraphics adapterHiSilicon Maleoon 920Memory12 GB , LPDDR5Display7.93 inch 1.1:1, 2440 x 2240 pixel 418 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, OLED, 1 - 120 Hz LTPO 2.0, Carbon Fibre Inner Screen Plate; Front-Display: 6.45 inch, 2440 x 1080 px, 1 - 120 Hz LTPO 2.0, Kunlun Glass 2, glossy: yes, HDR, 120 HzStorage512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 512 GB , 479.07 GB freeConnections1 USB 2.0, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, 1 Infrared, Audio Connections: USB-C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, NFC, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, color spectrum, OTG, NearLinkNetworking802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/), Bluetooth 5.2, 2G (850, 900, 1800, 1900 MHz), 3G (Band 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 8, 19), LTE (Band 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66), Dual SIM, LTE, GPSSizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 4.6 x 156.6 x 144.1Battery5110 mAh Lithium-IonChargingwireless charging, fast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 12CameraPrimary Camera: 50 MPix (24 mm, f/1.4-4.0, OIS) + 48 MPix (4x optical zoom, f/3.0, 90 mm, OIS) + 40 MPix (Ultra Wide, f/2.2, 13 mm); Camera2-API-LeveL: LimitedSecondary Camera: 8 MPix (f/2.2)Additional featuresSpeakers: Dual, Keyboard: OnScreen, 66W-Charger, USB-Cabel, EMUI 15, 24 Months Warranty, Bluetooth Audio Codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC, L2HC | GNSS: GPS (L1, L5), Glonass (L1), BeiDou (B1, B1C, B2a), Galileo (E1, E5a) | HDR: HLG, HDR10, HDR Vivid | DRM Widevine L1 | IPX8 | USB Copy Test: 31.91 MB/s (connected to Samsung 980 Pro in an Asus ROG Strix Arion Case (USB 3.2 Gen. 2), Supported File Systems for external storages: FAT32, exFAT, NTFS | Body-SAR: W/kg, Head-SAR: W/kg | max. charging speed: 66 W (wired) / 50 W (wireless), fanless, waterproofWeight239 g
Price1999 EuroLinksHuawei homepageNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
外壳和连接性 - 配备 IPX8 和昆仑玻璃 2 的 Mate X6折叠后的华为 Mate X6 厚度不到 10 毫米，看起来并不比传统智能手机大。展开时，它超薄，只有摄像头驼峰非常厚，但折叠后不会变得头重脚轻。它的做工质量很好，屏幕上的折痕也不明显。它的打开角度也可以非常灵活地调整。
Mate X6 具备 IPX8 防水等级，正面采用第二代昆仑玻璃，从 1.2 米的高度跌落也不会有任何影响。黑色测试机的背面由人造皮革制成，具有很好的防污和防滑效果。
遗憾的是，华为没有提供关于手机 USB 端口的任何准确细节。无论如何，它支持有线图像输出，包括可选的桌面模式。不过，在拷贝测试中，接口的速度非常慢，这更像是 USB 2.0 的表现。
它的其他连接功能也令人印象深刻。除了可用于控制家庭娱乐、空调等设备的红外触发器外，Mate X6 还支持手写笔。但遗憾的是，在中国境外无法购买。
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
尺寸比较
Huawei Mate X6 Honor Magic V3 Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 DIN A6 ❌
尺寸比较
Huawei Mate X6 Honor Magic V3 Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 DIN A6 ❌
通信和操作 - 华为 Mate X6 上既没有 5G 也没有 Wi-Fi 7华为 Mate X6 的通信模块似乎有点老气横秋。这是由于贸易限制造成的，但这并不能改变事实。华为可折叠手机仅支持 Wi-Fi 6，即既不支持现代的 Wi-Fi 7，也不支持强大的 6 GHz 频段。与我们的参考路由器华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 结合使用时，它的接收性能会暂时减弱，但这在日常使用中应该不会很明显。
Mate X6 最多只能使用 LTE 访问移动数据网络，不支持快速 5G。尽管如此，华为还是强调了其智能手机的良好接收特性，而我们在日常使用中也确实证实了这一点：在一次媒体考察中，我们在酒店房间里使用 iPhone或 Magic7 Pro但使用 Mate X6 就没有问题。
华为智能手机的电话功能同样令人印象深刻，语音质量自然，噪音抑制效果良好。
电源按钮内的电容式指纹传感器可用于生物识别安全，识别率高，速度快。此外，还可通过前置摄像头进行安全性较低的面部识别。
线性振动电机可提供清晰的触觉反馈，两个电容式触摸屏可实现快速、精确的输入。
NetworkingHuawei Mate X6802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax iperf3 transmit AXE11000
995 (min: 961) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
795 (min: 382) MBit/s ∼89%
Honor Magic V3Wi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
919 (min: 808) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
771 (min: 387) MBit/s ∼86%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax iperf3 transmit AXE11000
531 (min: 263) MBit/s ∼53%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
761 (min: 683) MBit/s ∼85%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
770 (min: 402) MBit/s ∼42%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1365 (min: 1221) MBit/s ∼74%
Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldWi-Fi 7 iperf3 transmit AXE11000
969 (min: 909) MBit/s ∼97%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
893 (min: 418) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1845 (min: 924) MBit/s ∼100%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1843 (min: 1524) MBit/s ∼100%
Average 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax iperf3 transmit AXE11000
822 (min: 214) MBit/s ∼83%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
823 (min: 234) MBit/s ∼92%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1175 (min: 417) MBit/s ∼64%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1241 (min: 743) MBit/s ∼67%
Average of class Smartphone iperf3 transmit AXE11000
687 (min: 49.8) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000
723 (min: 52) MBit/s ∼81%
iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz
1273 (min: 508) MBit/s ∼69%
iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz
1377 (min: 451) MBit/s ∼75%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø757 (402-836) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHz; iperf 3.1.3: Ø1363 (1221-1406) Huawei Mate X6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø995 (961-1019) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø522 (263-608) Huawei Mate X6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø795 (382-940) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø759 (683-800)
软件和可持续性 - Mate X6 仅会在 3 年内接受更新华为 Mate X6 预装了基于开源Android 12 的 EMUI 15。任何拥有过华为或Honor 智能手机的人都不难找到自己的路。它的更新支持时间很短：制造商只承诺了两次主要的 EMUI 更新和三年的安全补丁。
这款华为智能手机也没有预装谷歌的服务和应用程序。如果 AppGallery 无法满足您的需求，您可以安装极光应用商店，它可以让您完全访问 Google Play 商店。我们已在 另一篇文章因此，除了 Google Pay 之外，几乎所有软件限制都可以绕过。
在可持续发展的话题上，华为一直保持低调。该公司没有提供任何关于可折叠手机二氧化碳排放量或可回收材料使用情况的信息，更不用说可持续发展报告了。Mate X6 的外包装由纸板制成，其他包装材料也没有使用塑料。不过有一个缺点，那就是相当大的纸箱是完全收缩包装的。
摄像头 - Mate X6 的多功能设置前置摄像头
主摄像头华为 Mate X6 的两个前置摄像头都只使用 800 万像素，但光圈为 f/2.2，可折叠显示屏中的镜头比前置镜头（f/2.4）稍亮。但它们的质量仍然不错。即便如此，你还是可以用手机的主摄像头拍出更好的自拍照，该摄像头可选择使用盖板显示屏作为取景器。
主镜头具有可变光圈（f/1.4 - f/4.0），可根据光线条件自动调节。不过，也可以分九个步骤手动使用。拍摄出的照片效果不错，但在某些情况下景深可以更好一些。该相机在拍摄特写时的对比度也相当高。它在弱光环境下表现出色，在较短的曝光时间内也能获得非常好的效果。另一个优点是色彩还原相当自然。
高分辨率超广角镜头对该设备的相机设置进行了补充，但遗憾的是，该镜头在照片边缘的锐度明显下降。它还配备了 4 倍光学潜望式变焦，最大放大倍率可达 100 倍，同时还可用作微距镜头。放大 10 倍以内的效果会很好，超过 10 倍画质会明显下降。
主设备的所有镜头都能以 4k/60fps 的速度录制视频。图像稳定效果良好。前置摄像头可以拍摄 4K/30 FPS 的视频。
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Main cameraMain cameraUltra-wide angle5x zoomLow-lightclick to load imagesHuawei Mate X6Honor Magic7 ProApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesHuawei Mate X6Honor Magic7 ProApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesHuawei Mate X6Honor Magic7 ProApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesHuawei Mate X6Honor Magic7 ProApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesHuawei Mate X6Honor Magic7 ProApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
3.6 ∆E8.1 ∆E6.1 ∆E8.7 ∆E5.9 ∆E2.4 ∆E7.1 ∆E3.1 ∆E5.9 ∆E6.7 ∆E5.4 ∆E0.8 ∆E3.4 ∆E7.3 ∆E4.8 ∆E0.9 ∆E4.4 ∆E4.1 ∆E5.8 ∆E1.2 ∆E6.3 ∆E2.9 ∆E6.3 ∆E8.8 ∆EColorChecker Huawei Mate X6: 5 ∆E min: 0.81 - max: 8.76 ∆E28.8 ∆E48.3 ∆E37.9 ∆E34.6 ∆E42.5 ∆E54.8 ∆E49.1 ∆E33 ∆E39.3 ∆E28.4 ∆E57.2 ∆E58.7 ∆E28.3 ∆E44.6 ∆E34.5 ∆E63.3 ∆E40 ∆E40 ∆E47.7 ∆E57.3 ∆E47.9 ∆E36.4 ∆E24.4 ∆E13.9 ∆EColorChecker Huawei Mate X6: 41.29 ∆E min: 13.91 - max: 63.29 ∆E
Huawei Mate X6Huawei Mate X6
可折叠显示屏 - 华为可折叠显示屏中的 LTPO 面板非常醒目子像素阵列华为 Mate X6 的可折叠 OLED 显示屏采用 1 到 120 Hz 的动态刷新率。它的亮度不错，平均亮度为 1,179 cd/m²，在大多数光线条件下完全够用；喜欢手动调节亮度的用户只能使用 653 cd/m²。不过，华为可折叠手机的峰值亮度还是无法达到 Galaxy Z Fold6或 像素 9 Pro 折叠机.
我们使用示波器测得的基频约为 360 Hz。不过，由于其高频 PWM 调光和平坦的振幅，这应该很少会引起用户的抱怨。
1159cd/m²1167cd/m²1174cd/m²1200cd/m²1182cd/m²1185cd/m²1192cd/m²1181cd/m²1174cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 1200 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 1179.3 cd/m² Minimum: 2.3 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 97 %Center on Battery: 1182 cd/m²Contrast: ∞:1 (Black: 0 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.2 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.76}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.2 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5}99.8% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.26CCT: 6741 K
Huawei Mate X6OLED, 2440x2240, 7.9"Honor Magic V3OLED, 2344x2156, 7.9"Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6AMOLED, HDR - HDR10+, HGL, 2nd Screen: 6.3", 2376x968, Glass Victus 2, 2160x1856, 7.6"Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldOLED LTPO, 2152x2076, 8"Screen6%5%16%Brightness middle (cd/m²)11821019 -14%1396 18%1793 52%Brightness (cd/m²)11791032 -12%1387 18%1599 36%Brightness Distribution (%)9795 -2%89 -8%66 -32%Black Level * (cd/m²)Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.21 17%1.7 -42%0.9 25%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *2.92.2 24%2.5 14%3.1 -7%Greyscale dE 2000 *2.21.7 23%1.5 32%1.7 23%Gamma2.26 97%2.26 97%2.16 102%2.19 100%CCT6741 96%6473 100%6495 100%6714 97%* ... smaller is better
Display: HDR Peak Brightness | APL18 Peak Brightness Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2778 cd/m² +73%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2687 cd/m² +68%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1712 cd/m² +7%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1602 cd/m² Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2724 cd/m² +71%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2684 cd/m² +68%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1595 cd/m² Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1009 cd/m² -37%
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM detected 360 HzAmplitude: 15.16 %Secondary Frequency: 1428 HzThe display backlight flickers at 360 Hz (worst case, e.g., utilizing PWM) .
The frequency of 360 Hz is relatively high, so most users sensitive to PWM should not notice any flickering. However, there are reports that some users are still sensitive to PWM at 500 Hz and above, so be aware.
In comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8013 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
分钟
25 %
50 %
75 %
100 %固定缩放级别和不同亮度设置下的测量系列（最低亮度下的振幅曲线看起来很平，但这是缩放造成的。信息框显示的是最小亮度下的振幅放大图）。
灰度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）视角稳定性 室外
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White1.87 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 1.005 ms rise↘ 0.868 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 10 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.1 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey1.25 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 0.6305 ms rise↘ 0.623 ms fallThe screen shows very fast response rates in our tests and should be very well suited for fast-paced gaming.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 5 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (31.4 ms).
封面显示屏 - 可以更亮子像素阵列事实证明，Mate X6 的外置显示屏在全表面白色显示屏测试中的亮度明显高于其可折叠显示屏，屏幕中央亮度达到 1,658 cd/m²；如果没有环境光传感器，则最高亮度可达 635 cd/m²。
此外，该显示屏的峰值亮度也明显更高，在缩小白色区域测试（APL18：2,672 cd/m²）和 HDR 测量（2,759 cd/m²）中均是如此。
其色彩还原与可折叠面板相当，非常准确。华为在 PWM 调光方面也毫不妥协，在这款屏幕上使用了相同的技术。
Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldOLED, 2424x1080, 6.3"Honor Magic V3OLED, 2376x1060, 6.4"Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6AMOLED, 2376x968, 6.3"Huawei Mate X6OLED, 2440x1080, 6.5"ScreenBrightness middle (cd/m²)2090174313631658Brightness (cd/m²)1876177513691663Brightness Distribution (%)77889498Black Level * (cd/m²)Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.50.93.31.1Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *3.52.14.52.2Greyscale dE 2000 *1.91.82.31.9Gamma2.25 98%2.25 98%2.06 107%2.27 97%CCT6676 97%6353 102%6633 98%6709 97%* ... smaller is better
Display: HDR Peak Brightness | APL18 Peak Brightness Display / HDR Peak Brightness
Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4394 cd/m² +174%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2759 cd/m² +72%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2759 cd/m² +72%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2649 cd/m² +65%
1602 cd/m² Display / APL18 Peak Brightness
Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2784 cd/m² +75%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2672 cd/m² +68%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2623 cd/m² +64%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
2440 cd/m² +53%
1595 cd/m²
灰度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩空间（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
饱和度（色彩模式：正常，色温：标准，目标色彩空间：sRGB）视角稳定性 室外性能、排放和电池寿命华为 Mate X6 搭载自主研发的 麒麟 9020，可使用 12GB RAM。其纯粹的 CPU 性能确实不错，确保了日常使用中的流畅运行和多任务处理。在 Geekbench 多核测试中（有 12 个内核可用），该 SoC 的性能甚至超过了 Tensor G4.
虽然集成的 马龙 920图形单元的时钟频率略高于前代产品，但仍不支持光线追踪。在基准测试中，它在对比领域以相当大的差距落后。它的人工智能性能也是如此。
尽管华为没有提供有关其内部存储的任何准确信息，但它似乎是一个快速的 UFS 4.0 类型，其性能在基准测试中毋庸置疑。
在测试过程中，手机表面温度始终保持在安全水平。不过，在负载情况下，SoC 的性能明显下降。
它的扬声器音质很好，即使低音几乎没有--这也是为什么在全音量时显得不和谐的原因。
在我们的 Wi-Fi 测试中，该设备的续航时间接近 13 小时--这是一个不错的结果，但竞争对手的续航时间总是更长。Mate X6 的无线充电功率高达 50 瓦，使用数据线充电的功率甚至高达 66 瓦。在我们的测试中，使用后者充满电需要 52 分钟（50%：16 分钟，80%：30 分钟）。
Geekbench 6.5 | Geekbench 5.5 | Antutu v10 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark Geekbench 6.5
Single-CoreSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
2239 Points +41%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
2170 Points +37%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1359 Points -14%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1982 Points +25%Average of class Smartphone (196 - 3883, n=209, last 2 years)
1737 Points +10%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
1586 Points Huawei Pura 70 UltraHiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
1446 Points -9%Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (1278 - 1586, n=3)
1383 Points -13% Multi-CoreSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
6894 Points +40%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
6279 Points +27%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4882 Points -1%Average of class Smartphone (830 - 11634, n=209, last 2 years)
5112 Points +4%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
4938 Points Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (4501 - 4938, n=3)
4648 Points -6%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4536 Points -8%Huawei Pura 70 UltraHiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
4484 Points -9%Geekbench 5.5
Single-CoreSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1651 Points +38%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1374 Points +15%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
1193 Points Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (n=1)
1193 Points 0%Average of class Smartphone (145 - 2635, n=110, last 2 years)
1183 Points -1%Huawei Pura 70 UltraHiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
1087 Points -9% Multi-CoreSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
5899 Points +35%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
4366 Points Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (n=1)
4366 Points 0%Huawei Pura 70 UltraHiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
4221 Points -3%Average of class Smartphone (550 - 9512, n=110, last 2 years)
4119 Points -6%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
3874 Points -11%Antutu v10 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1685774 Points +40%Average of class Smartphone (142748 - 3269237, n=136, last 2 years)
1483423 Points +23%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1390723 Points +15%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1322101 Points +10%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
1205616 Points Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (1178219 - 1205616, n=2)
1191918 Points -1%Huawei Pura 70 UltraHiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
968434 Points -20%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
18026 Points +24%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
17917 Points +23%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
16056 Points +10%Average of class Smartphone (4507 - 28557, n=182, last 2 years)
14845 Points +2%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
14593 Points Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (14209 - 14593, n=2)
14401 Points -1%Huawei Pura 70 UltraHiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
13575 Points -7%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
12938 Points -11%CrossMark - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1473 Points +22%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
1209 Points Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (n=1)
1209 Points 0%Average of class Smartphone (187 - 2856, n=115, last 2 years)
1150 Points -5%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1102 Points -9%Huawei Pura 70 UltraHiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
1031 Points -15%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
983 Points -19%BaseMark OS II
OverallSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9555 Points +18%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
8400 Points +4%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
8075 Points Average of class Smartphone (1196 - 16690, n=146, last 2 years)
7668 Points -5%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
7637 Points -5%Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (7087 - 8075, n=3)
7546 Points -7%Huawei Pura 70 UltraHiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
7455 Points -8% SystemSamsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
15087 Points +23%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
12221 Points Average of class Smartphone (2368 - 21153, n=146, last 2 years)
11434 Points -6%Huawei Pura 70 UltraHiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
11385 Points -7%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
11279 Points -8%Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (10361 - 12221, n=3)
10982 Points -10%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
8038 Points -34% MemoryGoogle Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
10023 Points +15%Huawei Pura 70 UltraHiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
9145 Points +5%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
9073 Points +4%Average of class Smartphone (962 - 24052, n=146, last 2 years)
8756 Points 0%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
8750 Points Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (6574 - 8750, n=3)
7828 Points -11%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
7426 Points -15% GraphicsHonor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
34612 Points +69%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
32352 Points +58%Average of class Smartphone (1046 - 384996, n=146, last 2 years)
25938 Points +27%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
21728 Points +6%Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (20494 - 20791, n=3)
20672 Points +1%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
20494 Points Huawei Pura 70 UltraHiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
16129 Points -21% WebGoogle Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1983 Points +2%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
1940 Points Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
1882 Points -3%Huawei Pura 70 UltraHiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
1839 Points -5%Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (1783 - 1940, n=3)
1839 Points -5%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1717 Points -11%Average of class Smartphone (858 - 2587, n=146, last 2 years)
1699 Points -12%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
36048 Points +178%Average of class Smartphone (3769 - 81594, n=129, last 2 years)
19029 Points +47%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
17812 Points +38%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
12951 Points Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12651 Points -2%Huawei Pura 70 UltraHiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
11969 Points -8%Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (10280 - 12951, n=2)
11616 Points -10%AImark - Score v3.x
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
24087 Points +728%Average of class Smartphone (82 - 307528, n=109, last 2 years)
20788 Points +614%Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (2910 - 2928, n=2)
2919 Points 0%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
2910 Points Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1434 Points -51%Huawei Pura 70 UltraHiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
1051 Points -64%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
963 Points -67%Geekbench AI
Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1Average of class Smartphone (122 - 1543, n=32, last 2 years)
531 Points +135%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
463 Points +105%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
326 Points +44%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
409 Points +81%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
226 Points Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (n=1)
226 Points 0% Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
4325 Points +1814%Average of class Smartphone (122 - 9476, n=32, last 2 years)
1473 Points +552%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
463 Points +105%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
325 Points +44%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
226 Points Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (n=1)
226 Points 0% Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.1Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
6324 Points +1212%Average of class Smartphone (118 - 13068, n=32, last 2 years)
2246 Points +366%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
1091 Points +126%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
713 Points +48%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
482 Points Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (n=1)
482 Points 0%AI Benchmark
Score V5Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, Adreno 750, 12288
3199 Points +1912%Honor Magic V3Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
3092 Points +1845%Average of class Smartphone (46.4 - 3334, n=39, last 2 years)
645 Points +306%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
159 Points Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (n=1)
159 Points 0%Huawei Pura 70 UltraHiSilicon Kirin 9010, Maleoon 910, 16384
154 Points -3% Score V6Average of class Smartphone (55.6 - 22780, n=84, last 2 years)
5362 Points +1174%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldGoogle Tensor G4, Mali-G715 MP7, 16384
1168 Points +177%Huawei Mate X6HiSilicon Kirin 9020, Maleoon 920, 12288
421 Points Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (n=1)
421 Points 0%
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Wild Life Score | Steel Nomad Light Score | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics | 2560x1440 Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4693 Points +152%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4341 Points +133%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2602 Points +40%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1863 Points Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
1539 Points -17%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4626 Points +143%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
4021 Points +111%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
2584 Points +36%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1903 Points Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
1573 Points -17%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18997 Points +156%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
18726 Points +152%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
9302 Points +25%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7428 Points Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
5656 Points -24%3DMark / Wild Life Score
Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
7491 Points Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
5711 Points -24%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
Points -100%3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1633 Points +193%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1549 Points +178%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1386 Points +149%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1093 Points +96%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
557 Points 3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics
Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
6284 Points Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
6003 Points -4%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
5784 Points -8%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5769 Points -8%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3397 Points -46%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Graphics
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
28856 Points +106%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
22388 Points +60%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16473 Points +18%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14009 Points Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
9928 Points -29%3DMark / Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
15231 Points +38%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
11584 Points +5%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
11003 Points Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
9984 Points -9%Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
8668 Points -21%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +100%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
120 fps +100%Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps 0%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps 0%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
437 fps +12%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
423 fps +8%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
398 fps +2%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
390 fps Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
342 fps -12%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +103%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
117 fps +98%Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
61 fps +3%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +2%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
355 fps +65%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
299 fps +39%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
253 fps +18%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
215 fps Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
183 fps -15%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +118%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86 fps +56%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +9%Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
59 fps +7%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
55 fps GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
236 fps +52%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
196 fps +26%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
167 fps +8%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
155 fps Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
129 fps -17%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89 fps +178%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59 fps +84%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
49 fps +53%Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps +19%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
122 fps +77%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
121 fps +75%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
79 fps +14%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
55 fps -20%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67 fps +52%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
51 fps +16%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
44 fps Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps -45%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
38 fps -14%Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps -27%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
75 fps +108%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
68 fps +89%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
44 fps +22%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
36 fps Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
30 fps -17%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
81 fps +108%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps +54%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
60 fps +54%Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
52 fps +33%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
39 fps GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
173 fps +82%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
133 fps +40%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
109 fps +15%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95 fps Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
82 fps -14%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps +119%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
31 fps +94%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
27 fps +69%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
20 fps +25%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
16 fps Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
13 fps -19%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 2.0 | Speedometer 3 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Huawei Mate X6 (Chrome 131)
177.082 Points Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (168.6 - 177.1, n=2)
172.8 Points -2%Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (Chrome 125)
157.304 Points -11%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
155.837 Points -12%Average of class Smartphone (23.8 - 358, n=142, last 2 years)
152.3 Points -14%Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)
117.483 Points -34%Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
87.027 Points -51%Honor Magic V3 (Performance Mode, Chrome 128)
64.069 Points -64%Speedometer 2.0 - Result 2.0
Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (250 - 255, n=2)
253 runs/min +1%Huawei Mate X6 (Chrome 131)
250 runs/min Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
237 runs/min -5%Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (Chrome 125)
223 runs/min -11%Average of class Smartphone (15.2 - 643, n=113, last 2 years)
223 runs/min -11%Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)
182 runs/min -27%Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
115 runs/min -54%Speedometer 3 - Score 3.0
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
15.7 runs/min +1%Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (15.6 - 15.8, n=2)
15.7 runs/min +1%Huawei Mate X6 (Chrome 131)
15.6 runs/min Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)
14.9 runs/min -4%Average of class Smartphone (1.03 - 42.8, n=123, last 2 years)
14.1 runs/min -10%Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (Chrome 125)
13 runs/min -17%Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
6.53 runs/min -58%WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
211 Points +13%Huawei Mate X6 (Chrome 131)
186 Points Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (145 - 186, n=2)
165.5 Points -11%Average of class Smartphone (27 - 306, n=137, last 2 years)
143.2 Points -23%Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)
112 Points -40%Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
69 Points -63%Huawei Pura 70 Ultra
Points -100%Octane V2 - Total Score
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
66754 Points +21%Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)
62374 Points +13%Huawei Mate X6 (Chrome 131)
55113 Points Huawei Mate X6 (Edge 131)
54211 Points -2%Huawei Mate X6 (Huawei Browser 15.0.4)
48575 Points -12%Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (42026 - 55113, n=4)
49981 Points -9%Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (Chrome 125)
49290 Points -11%Average of class Smartphone (2228 - 126661, n=188, last 2 years)
48100 Points -13%Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
27245 Points -51%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Honor Magic V3 (Chrome 128)
2065.6 ms * -192%Average of class Smartphone (257 - 28190, n=149, last 2 years)
1172 ms * -66%Huawei Pura 70 Ultra (Chrome 125)
779.1 ms * -10%Average HiSilicon Kirin 9020 (707 - 848, n=3)
778 ms * -10%Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Chrome 130)
710.4 ms * -0%Huawei Mate X6 (Chrome 131)
707.2 ms * Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 (Chrom 127)
554.57 ms * +22%* ... smaller is better
Huawei Mate X6Honor Magic V3Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldHuawei Pura 70 UltraAverage 512 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class SmartphoneAndroBench 3-5-25%-43%-60%-43%-28%-53% Sequential Read 256KB (MB/s)4370.483825.59 -12%4115.34 -6%1827.6 -58%1991.82 -54%3709 ?(1851 - 4512, n=51) -15%2148 ?(270 - 4370, n=197, last 2 years) -51% Sequential Write 256KB (MB/s)4030.383393.12 -16%2083.25 -48%1126.34 -72%1832.42 -55%3123 ?(1494 - 4051, n=51) -23%1848 ?(103.2 - 4051, n=197, last 2 years) -54% Random Read 4KB (MB/s)503.63365.48 -27%398.01 -21%263.31 -48%387.34 -23%383 ?(204 - 512, n=51) -24%295 ?(47.6 - 614, n=197, last 2 years) -41% Random Write 4KB (MB/s)963.72527.68 -45%45.73 -95%376.94 -61%588.69 -39%479 ?(45.7 - 987, n=51) -50%347 ?(9.4 - 987, n=197, last 2 years) -64%
Max. LoadIdle
42.1 °C42 °C38.7 °C 40.4 °C38.8 °C32.8 °C 30.8 °C30 °C30.2 °C
Maximum: 42.1 °CAverage: 36.2 °C
36.2 °C38.5 °C39 °C32.3 °C39.6 °C40.4 °C28.3 °C29 °C30.6 °C
Maximum: 40.4 °CAverage: 34.9 °C Power Supply (max.) 29.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.5 °C | Fluke t3000FC (calibrated) & Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
27.2 °C27.1 °C26.3 °C 7.1 °C26.5 °C26.2 °C 26.1 °C26.5 °C26.3 °C
Maximum: 27.2 °CAverage: 24.4 °C
26.2 °C26.2 °C26.5 °C26.1 °C25.9 °C26.2 °C25.9 °C26.1 °C25.6 °C
Maximum: 26.5 °CAverage: 26.1 °C Power Supply (max.) 25.2 °C | Room Temperature 21.2 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 36.2 °C / 97 F, compared to the average of 32.9 °C / 91 F for the devices in the class Smartphone.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.1 °C / 108 F, compared to the average of 35.2 °C / 95 F, ranging from 21.9 to 247 °C for the class Smartphone.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.4 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 34 °C / 93 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 24.4 °C / 76 F, compared to the device average of 32.9 °C / 91 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad stress test
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test StabilityGoogle Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
78.7 % +50%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
67.2 % +28%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
59.2 % +13%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
52.6 % Huawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
41.9 % -20% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestHuawei Pura 70 UltraMaleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.4 % +72%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
76.9 % +33%Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
76.5 % +33%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58.5 % +1%Huawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
57.7 % Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityHuawei Mate X6Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
99.1 % Google Pixel 9 Pro FoldMali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
82.5 % -17%Honor Magic V3Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.7 % -28%Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
70.5 % -29%
Huawei Mate X6 Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø10.3 (6.56-11.4) Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø16.8 (14.8-25.4) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø19.9 (19.3-25.1) Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø13.5 (12-15.6) Huawei Pura 70 Ultra Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø9.41 (9.39-9.44) Huawei Mate X6 Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø37.6 (23.7-45) Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø62.5 (50.9-85.9) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø68.6 (65.2-97) Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø48.7 (43.1-54.8) Huawei Pura 70 Ultra Maleoon 910, Kirin 9010, 1 TB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability: Ø28.8 (14.4-34.4) Huawei Mate X6 Maleoon 920, Kirin 9020, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø4.18 (4.16-4.2) Honor Magic V3 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø8.68 (8.38-11.7) Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3 for Galaxy, 512 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.0.0.15: Ø9.5 (9-12.8) Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold Mali-G715 MP7, Tensor G4, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.03 (6.39-7.74)
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Huawei Mate X6 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (86.2 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 25.5% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (10.3% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.3% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.8% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 3.1% away from median(+) | highs are linear (4.3% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (17.6% difference to median)Compared to same class» 13% of all tested devices in this class were better, 8% similar, 79% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 34% of all tested devices were better, 8% similar, 58% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold6 audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (91.8 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.8% lower than median(+) | bass is linear (6.2% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 2.8% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.1% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(±) | higher highs - on average 7.5% higher than median(+) | highs are linear (1.9% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(±) | linearity of overall sound is average (15.5% difference to median)Compared to same class» 4% of all tested devices in this class were better, 3% similar, 93% worse» The best had a delta of 11%, average was 35%, worst was 134%Compared to all devices tested» 22% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 73% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome 131)
12h 59min
Battery runtime - WiFi v1.3
Huawei Mate X65110 mAh
13 h Honor Magic V35150 mAh
13.8 h Samsung Galaxy Z Fold64400 mAh
15.2 h Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold4650 mAh
14.7 h
Notebookcheck 总评分华为 Mate X6 是一款极具吸引力的可折叠手机，其多功能摄像头和纤薄的机身尤为突出。不过，由于目前的贸易禁运，这款手机还存在一些技术缺陷。
Back to the verdict
Huawei Mate X6
- 01/29/2025 v8
Daniel Schmidt
Chassis91%
Keyboard70 / 75 → 93%
Pointing Device94%
Connectivity61 / 69 → 89%
Weight87%
Battery89%
Display91%
Games Performance21 / 55 → 39%
Application Performance68 / 85 → 80%
AI Performance19%
Temperature92%
Noise100%
Audio81 / 90 → 90%
Camera82%
Average64%
83%
Smartphone - Weighted Average
CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials25%Packaging50%Power Use96.4%Repairability40%Software Updates44.5% Total Sustainability Score: 42.7%
More articles related to this deviceHuawei Mate X6 (Mate X6 Series)
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Please share our article, every link counts!
Editor of the original article: Daisy Dickson - Translator - 464 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2023Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 714605 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via: